Post($): Florida budget plans clear committees with big dollar differences

Former Coral Gables Commissioner Jeannett Slesnick — in a bitter mayoral rematch race against Mayor Raul Valdes-Fauli — got a big endorsement Wednesday when former U.S. Sen. Bob Graham, who served 1987 to 2005, gave her his support.
Graham — who was also Florida’s 38th governor from 1979 to 1987 — and his wife Adele were among the hosts of a reception for Slesnick on Wednesday along with Raul Mas Canosa and Ana Permuy-Mas, Frank and Maria Elena Gonzalez and Sergio and Maria Concepcion, who opened their Santa Maria Street home for the fundraiser.
Read related: Rematch! Jeannett Slesnick will jump into Gables mayor’s race
The bartender said there were at least 150 people there. That’s more than three times the number of people who RSVPed.
Concepcion, who is in real estate also, said some nice things about Slesnick being one of the first people he met in the Gables and how he now goes to her for market advice because nobody knows more about Gables real estate than Slesnick.
The election is less than two weeks away and people have already been voting. Of the 7,546 absentee ballots that have been sent, 1,931 received had been received as of Wednesday, representing a 25.59% turnout so far, according to Miami-Dade Elections spokeswoman Suzy Trutie.
Every single vote counts since Valdes-Fauli only won by 187 votes in 2017.
Meanwhile, Valdes-Fauli has the endorsement of former mayor Jim Cason and the current Coral Gables Commission — the same people who dragged their feet and stood by while the former city manager and her henchman from Hollywood made the police chief’s life a living hell and who rubber stamped most of the zoning variances to allow out-of-scale development that many voters believe has gone overboard. No surprise here.
What happened to Jeb? Former Gov. Jeb Bush had endorsed Valdes-Fauli in 2017, very early on in the election.
Ladra guesses Jeb is as disappointed in Valdes-Fauli two years later as the rest of the Gables is.

Read Full Story

Pinecrest voters rejected a plan Tuesday that would seek $15 million in bonds to pay for approximately 18.5 miles (98,000 linear feet) of pipeline infrastructure so 739 properties can connect to Miami-Dade County water.
The vote came down to 63% against and 37% for taxing themselves an additional 23 cents per $1,000 of taxable value, or an average of $158 a year — of course, some homes would pay much, much more — for the next 20 years so that every property in the village would have access to county water.
Not even the promise of an additional 208 fire hydrants — which are not necessary to cover water needs according to the fire rescue guys but good for drumming up fear votes — could sway villagers who made the decision via a mail-in ballot only.
According to Miami-Dade County’s elections department, 5,720 of the 13,083 registered voters in Pinecrest returned ballots. That amounts to practically a 44% turnout.
The village undertook an aggressive “get out the vote campaign” that included eight — count ’em, eight; two per week, including the last one this past Saturday  — public workshops for residents and property owners to learn about the project and see the map. They were not very well attended.
The village slapped posters in public spaces and sent postcards to all registered voters and a letter from the administration explaining what the financial impact would be.
They got one of those FDOT-like signs with the blinking lights to remind folks to vote — and they hired a guy with a spinning sign on U.S. 1.
Read related: Pinecrest voters to decide if they’ll pay extra taxes to get county water
The two recurring themes among some of the 3,593 who voted against it were (1) a reluctance to subsidize the water hookup for homes of multimillionaires and (2) the concept that it should be a responsibility of Miami-Dade County, which would retain the infrastructure and derive all the profits from the water sales. Those were exactly the reasons that Councilman James McDonald voted against putting the referendum on the ballot and campaigned against it.
The red properties are the ones that need lines. The yellow properties already have lines and will have to pay for hooking up to water in addition to the additional tax.
Miami-Dade County policy dictates that the cost associated with new water infrastructure be borne by private developers/private property owners. Revenue from the sale of water to existing customers can only be used to fund expenditures and improvements to the existing infrastructure, not new infrastructure — not unless, of course, they can cover it with “economic development” like the megamall in Northwest Dade.
But the county has paid for some of the hookups.
When Pinecrest first incorporated in 1996, about 1,500 homes were on wells, without any way to hook up to the county water supply. The 2004 countywide Building Better Communities bond referendum supplied the village with $4.3 million and a Florida state grant gave another $1.5 million for the water pipeline infrastructure up to the sidewalk. That work was called Phase I and Phase II and was completed about 10 years ago, said City Manager Yocelyn Galiano.  Property owners still had to pay for the service hook-up connection from the public right of way to their homes/buildings, she said.
More than 2,100 people voted in favor, including, we suppose, advocates like former mayors Evelyn Greer and Cindy Lerner and former Councilwoman Cheri Ball, right, who basically stepped down to push for the measure and served as treasurer of the Pinecrest H2O political action committee.
Ball and her husband also happen to own a two-story, 6 bedroom, 4 bath house they bought in 2016 for $1.6 million — that doesn’t have access to county water.
Some might think this is over, that the referendum was a way of putting this long fought issue to rest. But Ladra knows it’s never that easy. Ball and the other proponents are unlikely to give up. And while it’s not a big county issue — only 2,000 people lack water access countywide compared to hundreds of thousands on septic tanks (more on that later) — there may be other places to turn to for funding.
“We’ll just keep looking for the funding from the state legislature, which we’be been doing but we keep getting vetoed,” Galiano said. “Maybe with this new governor…”

Read Full Story

Sun-Sentinel: Florida House targets Airbnb as it moves to preempt local rules on home rentals

Post($): Dominatrix tells Florida lawmakers: Don’t hurt consensual sex work

Sentinel: UCF administrator facing termination over misspending saga will be allowed to stay