Evil triumphed over good on Tuesday in the rushed, special election for Miami commission in District 4, to replace the late Commissioner Manolo Reyes., who must be rolling in his grave.
Ralph “Rafael” Rosado, an urban planning consultant and compulsive liar whose campaign was run and funded by Commissioner Joe Carollo, beat Jose Francisco Regalado, who left a really good job at the city’s building department at the request of Reyes’ family to follow his own family’s footsteps into public office.
Which means that Carollo will now get his third vote for the majority and will wield that baton with the same penchant for level-headed justice and service to others that he always has shown. Okay, stop laughing. Because it is not funny that it will be the exact opposite — political retaliation and personal benefit all the way.
Read related: Miami District 4 race is a referendum on Joe Carollo and his abuse of power
The election wasn’t even close, really. Rosado got 55% of the vote to Regalado’s 45%. With less than 11.5% of the 46,500 eligible voters in District 4, Rosado (or, better said, Carollo) won across the board — absentee or vote-by-mail ballots, early voting and Election Day votes, though by a larger margin with the ABs.
The negative tone of a relentless campaign against Regalado and his family waged by Carollo in mailers, TV ads and on the radio — could have turned people off and suppressed turnout, which was also dampened by the rain on Election Day.

Carollo likely spent hundreds of thousands of dollars from his Miami First political action committee to get Rosado elected. We won’t know how much until July, because PACs only have to report quarterly not every month. But some longtime political observers have said it could be up to or more than $1 million.
Regalado raised and spent more transparent money from his campaign, with almost $191,000 compared to $79,500 raised by Rosado, reported through May 29, according to the latest campaign finance reports.
Rosado reported raising absolutely nothing in one recent report. Because he didn’t have to raise money. Carollo was pouring money from his PAC into Rosado’s campaign, mostly attacking Regalado and his family, which includes his father, former Miami Mayor and Miami-Dade Property Appraiser Tomas Regalado, sister Raquel Regalado a Miami-Dade Commission and former Miami-Dade School Board member, and brother Tomas N. “Tommy” Regalado, a journalist who ran for the commission seat in District 3 in 2017 and lost.
They weren’t just bashed on the dynasty thing, que ya cae mal. They were called communists and drug dealers and professional campaigners, which is funny because that’s exactly what Carollo is. Crazy Joe, who has a history as a wife beater, also got personal on his daily morning radio show, attacking Raquel Regalado’s son, who despite having autism is a data processor and works, like a lot of autistic individuals, and Tomas Regalado’s supposed romantic dalliances. It was very ugly.
This 43-day election cycle made way for one of the nastiest Miami campaigns Ladra has seen. And that’s saying a lot.
Read related: Miami’s District 4 candidate Ralph Rosado is backed, helped by Joe Carollo
Rosado tried to distance himself from Carollo and has told everyone that he is going to prove he is independent, even though it appears he owes his victory to Crazy Joe, who was at the newly-elected commissioner’s watch party at El Atlacatl, a Salvadoran restaurant on Calle Ocho.
So was former City Attorney Victoria “Tricky Vicky” Mendez, Rosado’s BFF, who was fired last year after several controversies — including her family’s involvement in basically stealing homes from elderly residents and flipping them for huge profits.
So was Beba Sardiñas Mann, the president of the Crazy Joe Pollo Carollo Fan Club, who said she had an unbiased “forum” for candidates (it was really an ambush), and who will now be able to get her illegal street closures in Silver Bluff, the ones that were forcibly removed by the county after a court fight in 2023 (more on that later).
Also there: Former Miami-Dade Commissioner Xavier Suarez, who was the first Cuban-born mayor of Miami, Miami-Dade Tax Collector Dariel Fernandez, Brickell Homeowners Association President Ernesto Cuesta, Downtown Neighbors Association President James Torres, who has been accused of aligning with Carollo against Pardo, who was also there along with Commission Chairwoman Christine King.
Commissioner Miguel Gabela, who actively helped Regalado during the campaign, was also there. But he didn’t look as happy as Pardo did.
While there were promises of being congenial and working with all the commissioners, Carollo already lashed out at Gabela on Univision 23 Miami, and Ladra feels Mike will be on the losing side of the vote for the near future.
Rosado will have his first chance to show his supposed independence next week at the June 12 commission meeting, which promises to be a doozy after the last commission meeting ended abruptly in chaos when Carollo and Gabela went after each other verbally. But not with the lifetime term limits ballot question which is on the agenda. That’s a ruse (more on that later).
There are other things to watch where he is going to be Carollo’s puppet pocket swing vote, like the street closures at 22 locations in Silver Bluff, which is also on this Tuesday’s agenda.
Other items on the agenda include the sale and development of condos and a waterfront park on Watson Island, a no-bid concession agreement for Miami Marine Stadium and a presentation by the Miami Downtown Development Authority, which has come under fire recently for some of the six figure checks they give to billion dollar brands and which some residents want to abolish, trying to justify its existence.
Read related: Effort to dissolve Miami DDA cites ‘bloated’ salaries, redundancy, UFC gift
The term limits, which is proposed by Commissioner Damian Pardo, would prohibit anyone who has served the maximum terms as commissioner or mayor to run for that seat again in the future. Right now, an elected can skip a term or two and run again, like former Commissioner Frank Carollo, Crazy Joe’s bro, is doing this year in District 3.
If voters pass the lifetime limits, which seems easy enough, it could stop Carollo from running for mayor, as he has threatened to do this year, because he already served the maximum terms. There’s also a controversial proposal coming to move the election to even years, extending current terms by a year, which is also on the agenda, just not this agenda for next week (more on that later). This is being proposed under the guise of avoiding a legal challenge if either of the Carollos are elected this year at the same time the charter amendment on lifetime term limits are approved.
Carollo and Miami Mayor Francis Suarez, who also supported Rosado, have both come out against the lifetime term limits. Suarez would also be barred from running for mayor or for commissioner, since he served the maximum terms in both posts.
Rosado has publicly said that he generally likes the idea of the lifetime term limits. But he has also waffled on it and said he wants to hear the debate from his colleagues — as if they haven’t talked about it enough. More likely, he will support the watered down version that King has floated about forcing electeds to wait out two terms instead of just one before running again.
Because he knows that his buddies Carollo and Suarez — another unlikely pair of strange political bedfellows — are already raising money to fight it and push a no vote (more on that next).
It is more important as ever to be all over the Miami city commission like black on beans. Like green on grass. Like bees on sweet. Like government money on a bad idea. Help Ladra stay on top of the commission’s moves and antics with a donation today to Political Cortadito. Thank you for your support!

The post Ralph Rosado and Joe Carollo beat Jose Regalado in Miami D4 special election appeared first on Political Cortadito.

Read Full Story

The city of Miami commission meeting Thursday is a doozy.
There are agenda items on two potential ballot questions — one strengthening term limits and another setting up a redistricting committee — on the extension of the Omni Community Redevelopment Agency, the establishment of a needs assessment for the Allapattah CRA, a $135 million Parrot Jungle/Watson Island transaction, controversial amendments to the construction noise mitigation ordinance and the appeal of a historic preservation board decision that declassified the historic designation for part of Miami First Presbyterian Church to make way for an 80-story residential high rise.
Pace yourselves. Ladra expects there to be hours of public comment.
The noise waiver ordinance, alone, is expected to draw a crowd. It has not been significantly changed since the 1980s, said Commissioner Damian Pardo, who is sponsoring the amendment, which would expand the hours of permitted construction operations and make other changes to the construction noise mitigation process that critics have said are beneficial to developers.
Pardo said the amendments are “resident-led” and add protections.
“Our noise ordinance update tackles illegal and excessive noise in our communities. This initiative puts noise waivers under a magnifying glass — ensuring that activities requiring them meet higher standards of transparency and accountability,” the commissioner posted on Instagram.
“It’s about identifying bad actors early, protecting our neighborhoods, and making sure our communities remain places where people can live and thrive in peace,” Pardo said. “And while there are those people using dog whistles to build their profile, political ambitions or readership, we encourage residents to contact us, work with us productively and provide their feedback in order to create policies that serve our residents.”
There are increased fees for violations, a tougher process for applicants and an easier process for city staff to revoke a waiver or permit, he said. But critics worry that it also allows staff, not the city manager, to provide a waiver or a permit and that repeat violators will be let off the hook.
“And the kicker? Pardo claims this came from residents — yet most neighborhoods oppose it,” said DNA Vice Chair James Torres, a onetime D2 commission candidate. “The DNA wasn’t consulted, and he ghosted reporters when pressed for answers. Community quality of life is on the line.”
Pardo should withdraw this and concentrate on passing his very important referendum for the November election, which would ask voters if they want to extend term limits, creating “lifetime” limits for electeds who have already served two terms in that same position. He has said it is not to target his colleague on the dais, Miami Commissioner Joe Carollo, a two-time former mayor who has threatened to run again, though he hasn’t filed. But it would affect Carollo’s possible aspirations.
Read related: Voters in Miami may get to strengthen term limits and ban political retreads
In fact, it could change the dynamics on the commission for years to come, blocking people like former commissioners Frank Carollo, Willy Gort, Keon Hardemon and Marc Sarnoff from running for the same office again. Frank Carollo has already filed to run for commission in District 3, where he served twice before.
In a city like Miami, where recycling is usually about campaigns and not the environment, this is huge.
The other proposed ballot question for a proposed charter amendment that would prohibit the redrawing of City Commission districts with the intent to favor or disfavor a candidate or incumbent, establish a Citizens’ Redistricting Committee to draw districts after each Census and when required by law and provide a process for the naming of such a committee and getting its proposals to the city commission.

The commission Tuesday basically has to instruct City Attorney George Wysong to come back with the ballot language for the November election because this public referendum was part of the settlement agreement that the city reached last May after several residents and organizations sued in 2022 over the last time the districts were redrawn, saying that the districts were gerrymandered to favor partisan incumbents. Which it was.
But the item still should produce some interesting discussion — or bloviating from a particular commissioner (read: Carollo).
Several people from the public will likely speak to support the appeal of the declassification of the historic designation given to Miami First Presbyterian Church, which hopes to sell the back lot to developers who want to build an 80-story high-rise. There is a lot of opposition and the president of the Brickell Homeowners Association president wrote the commissioners to support the appeal (more on that later).
The items on the CRAs are interesting because there are three of them and two that seemingly compete. A resolution to expand the Omni CRA into Allapattah, sponsored by Commissioner Miguel Gabela, may be withdrawn, and probably will be if another resolution to accept and approve a “finding of necessity” to establish Allapattah’s very own CRA is passed first. That needs assessment states the areas to be “slum and blighted” and establishes the need for an Allapattah CRA with the prosed boundaries of SR 112/Airport Expressway to the north, I-95 and NW 7th Avenue to the east, the Miami River to the south, and NW 19th Avenue to the west.
Read related: Compromise may be reached at Miami commission on Omni/Allapattah CRAs
Then maybe the long-awaited Omni CRA life extension — needed to complete several projects in the pipeline and held hostage over the Allapattah situation for months — will finally pass. It is also on the long agenda, sponsored by Pardo, again.
Ladra hopes that this is the last time these two communities are pit against each other. At least on this.
The item on the Watson Island property seems pretty important, too. It would authorize the city manager to sell 5.4 acres of city-owned property near Parrot Jungle Island to developers for $135 million to develop residential and commercial uses, “and to return the balance of the property to the city for use as a new public waterfront park to be constructed by the developer.”
Also on the agenda is a memorandum of understanding with the management organization of The Underline’s “investment, operations, programming, maintenance, and management,” which would also authorize the city manager to spend up to $8.7 million in the 2025-26 fiscal year from the general fund, and a gazillion other things that seem pretty important.
It seems almost certain that several things will be withdrawn or deferred early on, which happens with some frequency and often leaves speakers in limbo after they’ve made plans to be at City Hall for a particular item.
The post Miami commission to tackle term limits, CRAs, noise, redistricting and more appeared first on Political Cortadito.

Read Full Story

The Miami Downtown Development Authority, an entity that was formed in 1967 to promote the urban core and bring development, has a budget of $13.5 million through a special tax levy on properties within its district boundaries in downtown, Brickell and Edgewater. About a quarter of that is on salaries, some of which seem excessive and redundant.
This has some people talking about dissolving the agency and one downtown activist calling for a November referendum if the city commission won’t do it.
One example of redundant salaries cited is a total of six people working in-house marketing and public relations functions for a total of more than $640,000 in salaries and benefits:

Head of marketing and communications — $157,091
Marketing advisor — $123,203
Marketing department “collaborator” — $53,539
Content contributor — $82,195
Public information officer — 91,957
Brand integrity expert — $134,662

And the DDA also has one of the state’s top public relations firms on retainer for another $175K a year.
Isn’t that a little redundant?
Read related: Miami DDA gives UFC $100K for event, despite protest from downtowners
That’s more than $800,000 on marketing and communications, a lot of investment in PR. And, yet, Ladra has never seen any promotion to bring suburbanites downtown, which seems like low-hanging fruit.
What’s a “brand integrity expert” anyway? Why is that needed for downtown redevelopment advocacy?
The redundancy seems to be a theme.
There is a head of urban planning pulling in $177,143 and an urban planning strategist making $107,261. But all urban planning and zoning decisions are made by the city commission through the planning and zoning board. And there are two “enhanced services coordinator” positions — one at $100,692 and another at $89,787 — as well as a head of enhanced services and government affairs making $116,711. There is also a business and grants expert ($104,425), an “office and finance expert” ($106,137), a business development advisor ($107132), a “strategic partnership specialist” ($121,567) and a chief of economic and development strategy ($205,326).
These seemingly redundant salaries are one of the arguments being made by Downtown Neighbors Association President James Torres, who did a public records request for the budget and salaries (posted above) after the agency gave $100,000 to the UFC for events at the Kaseya Center next month. The taxpayer giveaway is what set Torres off and led to his push to dissolve the agency he says is taking advantage of downtown property owners.
At the very least, Torres says, the residents should stop being taxed. The city commission could establish a business district, like in Wynwood, where only the commercial property owners would be taxed for the DDA services. “The residents are paying 58% of this tax,” Torres told Political Cortadito. “If it was truly for the benefit of residents, okay. But there are no discount cards. We have to hire a third party contract for our trash pick up.
“Residents want a divorce,” Torres said.
Read related: Op Ed by DNA President James Torres: Miami doesn’t need a DDA anymore
But DDA Director Christina Crespi says the marriage is strong and that the DDA has evolved over the years.
Fresh from a meeting to discuss efforts to mitigate the upcoming Ultra musical festival — coordination of traffic, communication to residents, working with the county to have the MetroMover open later — Crespi told Political Cortadito that the agency does a lot for the residents and businesses of the area. She cited the freebie circulator, the permit clinic, the downtown enhancement team of former homeless individuals staffing bathrooms at the park, the graffiti clean up (850 incidents of graffiti just this month, she added), the landscaping additions, pressure washing, the urban planning on Flagler Street, which included getting the law changed so bars could stay open longer, and a host of events.
They raise federal dollars, she said, adding that they secured $31 million for the Flagler Street project. And the agency is about to propose a design for a pedestrian bridge under I-95 to connect the the museum park to the north side, the former Miami Herald property. They’ve launched a 3D development pipeline interactive map on their website to keep people informed of construction projects in real time, Crespi said.
But “the real focus is economic development,” she added, justifying the large PR staff and outside contract. “We are marketing downtown globally,” Crespi told Ladra, adding that there are 65,000 followers on their Instagram account. “We provide day-to-day info to residents, create content to promote businesses, incentivize new businesses,” she said.
Of course, she gets paid $265,150 in salary and benefits to say that.

Read Full Story

Miami voters could say no to political retreads or professional politicians by extending term limits this November.
City Commissioner Damian Pardo wants to put a charter amendment on the Nov. 4 ballot so that elected officials who have served on the commission or as mayor for two terms cannot come back and run for office after a break. Like zombie politicos.
Currently, term limits in Miami are only for consecutive terms. That’s why Commissioner Joe Carollo, who was mayor from 1996 to 2001, can run again this year. Mayor Francis Suarez could, technically, sit this term out and run again in 2027. Former Mayor Tomas Regalado could run again, though he won’t want to now he’s Miami-Dade Property Appraiser. Former Commissioners Willy Gort, Frank Carollo — who is widely rumored to be looking at another District 3 run to take over what is now the “Carollo seat” — and Marc Sarnoff (gasp!) could run for commission again.
But not if voters amend the city charter to establish that anyone who has already served two terms, at any time, is ineligible to run for the same office again, “during their lifetime.” Pardo is sponsoring a resolution a Tuesday’s meeting that would direct the city attorney’s office to prepare the amendment for the Nov. 4 ballot where alongside the mayoral race and contests for commission districts 3 and 5. And District 4 if Commissioner Manolo Reyes runs for mayor, as expected.
Read related: Long list of potential 2025 Miami mayoral candidates starts to take form
Neither Carollo nor Reyes have officially announced or filed any paperwork with the city clerk’s office. Yet.
Is Pardo targeting Carollo, who he has been butting heads with on the commission since he was elected in 2023? Carollo thinks so. But Pardo said it is absolutely not.

“Nobody knows what he’s going to do,” Pardo said. “He keeps saying he’s going to go to Shangri-La. He wanted an appointment with the Trump administration. This is not about Joe Carollo.”
Pardo said it is about opening the city up to new people and ideas and points at how term limits have changed the leadership in Miami-Dade. “We’re looking at a whole new set of commissioners that came in,” he told Political Cortadito. “It changes the entire dynamic.”
The city’s own commission could be an example of how non establishment electeds can shake things up with the change made since Pardo and Commissioner Miguel Gabela, neither of whom have been in office before now, were elected in 2023.
“Miami residents have waited long enough for real change in our city government,” Pardo said in a statement, adding that the legislation “limits the participation of career politicians entrenched in City politics.
“We are committed to a more representative government that advocates for its residents’ interests,” Pardo said. “Holding public office should be about public service, not self-interest or monied interests. This legislation guarantees that our government remains as dynamic, responsive, and accountable as possible. We are ushering in a new era of transformational leadership and democracy in the Magic City—one in which public service is a privilege, not an entitlement.
“We are proud to introduce this measure and look forward to residents making their voices heard in the November general election.”
Read related: 2025 Miami Commission contests could be battles between some known names
All it has to do is get three votes on the commission next week, or two other votes aside from Pardo. Ladra suspects that Gabela will be supportive. And Reyes might want a safety net to take Carollo out if he wins the mayor’s race. But is his vote a conflict of interest? King is out. Not just because she does Carollo’s bidding, but because she honestly thinks that elections are the true expression of term limits.
If they approve next week’s measure, the city attorney’s office will still have to come back within 120 days to get the ballot language approved by September 5 to make it onto the November ballot.
Ladra suspects that, if it gets on the ballot, the amendment will win with an overwhelming majority. Nearly 70% of Miami Beach voters passed a similar measure in 2014, creating “lifetime term limits” for their electeds. It’s why commissioner Michael Gongora was blocked by a judge from running for re-election in 2021.
The amendment, if passed would be retroactive, which means that Carollo, if elected, would be de facto ousted from office. Any Carollo, actually, because if the commissioner’s brother Frank decides to come back and wins, that election would also be invalidated. Pardo said the seat could go to whoever came in second in the race — but he doesn’t really know.
Ladra says there will be lawsuits.
Candidates would be made aware of this at the time they qualify and voters would also be made aware that there are candidates who might be invalidated if the amendment passes. Basically, that they risk throwing their vote away if they cast it for a Carollo.
That makes for a good campaign slogan.
The post Voters in Miami may be asked to extend term limits and ban political retreads appeared first on Political Cortadito.

Read Full Story

After several months of holding the Omni Community Redevelopment Agency hostage, Miami Commissioner Miguel Gabela — who has pushed for its expansion into Allapattah, the heart of his District 1 — looks like he is ready to compromise with a CRA all his own.
Miami Commissioners last month directed City Manager Art Noriega to expedite the establishment of an Allapattah Community Redevelopment Agency and secure funding so that they can begin “priority projects” by the end of February. The proposed boundaries are Northwest 39th Street to the north, Northwest 19th Avenue to the west, Northwest Seventh Avenue to the east and the Miami River to the south.
Read related: Fight over Omni CRA causes new rifts, alliances on Miami City Commission
Commissioner Damian Pardo, who has been fighting to keep the current Omni CRA boundaries, get an extension on its life and create a separate Allapattah CRA, must be smiling ear to ear. He’s also putting his money where his mouth is. Pardo wants the city manager to find a way to “claw back” $2 million in tax increment funding a year, for the next five years, from the Omni CRA to be directed for capital improvements, infrastructure repairs/enhancements and affordable housing projects in Allapattah. It’s on Thursday’s agenda.
That’s guaranteed seed money of $10 million that can be leveraged to get more.

Will Gabela go for it? He has previously said help like that is too little, too slow and that he wants to leverage the future TIF monies an expanded Omni CRA could generate for Allapattah. Will $10 million cut it?

Read Full Story

The controversial and massive changes to Miami’s tree ordinance — which regulates the removal and pruning of trees — are seemingly unnecessary and, worse, directed by the development industry, which taints the legislation. Everyone knows that Commissioner Miguel Gabela, the dope they roped to sponsor this, is going to defer the vote at Thursday’s commission meeting.
Perhaps the existing ordinance could be tweaked a little, but this particular version of the legislation should be withdrawn (read: burned in a bonfire) because it appears, from public meetings and emails first made public by WLRN, that it has been specifically tailored to meet the needs of developers and the building industry.
Dozens of people spoke at the sunshine meeting called by Commissioner Damian Pardo last week, almost unanimously against the measure which is meant to streamline the permitting process for homeowners who want to remove trees from their property. But two people spoke in favor: Truly Burton, executive vice president of the Builders Association of South Florida, and lobbyist Melissa Tapanes Llahues, BASF president and longtime board member, and a frequent representative for many big developers.
Tapanes Llahues got up and almost spoke out of turn. She thinks she’s special. Pardo told her to wait until it was time for her to speak.
Burton said she was there to “clarify misinformation” because “neither the Builders Association of South Florida or anyone else on my board has colluded… on this item.”
Tapanes Llahues said she was there as a Coconut Grove homeowner and that she takes many cases pro-bono. That might be true, but she could also have a vested interest in those cases, like she has here. And she was very defensive about her involvement, which, again, has been documented in emails.
“The Builders Association of South Florida, myself included, learned of this ordinance when it appeared on the agenda,” she said, calling those who think she was lobbying without registering ignorant.
“We all want to protect the tree canopy,” Tapanes Llahues said. “Developers, builders, they plant these trees. Just like they build homes, they build schools, they build hospitals, they build our community.”
It was the second time, at least, that Tapanes made comments on behalf of the developers and in favor of the ordinance. At the commission meeting where this was discussed in December, Tapanes thanked Gabela for working with them on it.
“I’d like to just say that Commissioner Gabela has been working with the industry,” Tapanes said at the meeting. “We’re working with the commissioners’ office to make it reasonable for both developers and property owners.”
Caught with his political pants down, Gabela told WLRN that he had not spoken to Tapanes or any developers about the tree ordinance. “There is no collusion here, let me make it clear. I did not ask them to come. I haven’t had any conversation pertaining to the tree ordinance with Melissa Tapanes.”
Read related: Don’t live in Miami? Commissioner Joe Carollo says your opinion don’t matter
But the emails from Tapanes and the Builders Association to his staff show that there has been some collaboration. And Tapanes was not registered to lobby for the tree ordinance during this email exchange. It was only the day of the Dec. 12 meeting that she registered as a lobbyist after speaking at the meeting. The registration was not stamped by the clerk’s office til Dec. 16.
The industry’s involvement should cause everyone pause. Even more pause should be given to the fact that the ordinance changes don’t seem to be necessary. Gabela and city officials say they are trying to make it easier for homesteaded property owners to remove trees that can block the addition of a pool or circular driveway. Well, that can be done on a case-by-case basis without making blanket changes that allow developers to remove trees with impunity. Any homeowner who is about to sell could, under the proposed changes, clear the lot, making it more valuable to developers who can build with a larger footprint.
Several citizens who spoke said the real problem was with permitting and code enforcement to address the people who call cousin Robertico or Manolito to cut their trees at midnight on Sunday, like Pardo says happens all the time. Some people said code enforcement had to work harder and penalties should be higher.
The 28 pages of changes are confusing and seem to allow for too much tree removal, residents agreed. They almost unanimously took exception to a change that allows a landscape architect, rather than an arborist, inspect and make the determination on a tree’s viability.
“There are so many things that have been deleted… which makes the ordinance a little loose, and I think it has to be tight,” said Debbie Dolson. “You can’t leave places for loopholes.”

Cristina Colon, a biology professor, said the city was creating a “slippery slope” in favor of development. “A landscape architect does not have the training of knowledge of an arborist. “This is tantamount to saying if you need a root canal, you can have it done by your dentist or by the receptionist.”
The ordinance already allows for 25% pruning and there are hardship exemptions already available. Morningside activist Sandy Moise said she had asked the city for how many hardships had been applied for. No answer.
“The public has lost trust,” Moise said at last week’s sunshine meeting. “It feels shady,” she said of the ordinance changes.
Read related: Coconut Grove residents are ignored as Miami carves up D2 in redistricting
Political Cortadito called Assistant Building Director Jose Regalado, brother of the county commissioner, and emailed him and Building Director Ed Santamaria (former assistant city manger in Coral Gables) to ask how the tree fund dollars, paid mostly by developers who are allowed to remove trees, had collected and where those dollars have gone. No answer.
But the changes to the ordinance include a diversion of those dollars to the general fund — 50% the first year and 20% each year after that.
At last week’s sunshine meeting, Regalado said that the “main purpose of this was to simplify the process for residents and businesses” and that the majority of changes were to add exemptions in the Miami-Dade County code. He also said that in the past five years, 8,310 trees had been removed, 12,312 had been planted and another 1,676 had been relocated. These figures did not, however, include trees planted in the right of way or through the tree trust fund.
There are a lot of unknowns and this new ordinance is just not ready.
A group of 19 residents signed a letter to commissioners this week, asking them to completely withdraw the item until more work could be done.
“This agenda item, developed by the Building Department with input from the developer community, represents deeply flawed legislation that will significantly weaken protections for our trees and undermine Miami’s vital tree canopy. The current Tree Ordinance is not the issue. The problems lie in its implementation. Addressing these issues through proper management and operations is the real solution to improving outcomes for both residents and the environment.”
Specifically, they recommended addressing inefficiencies and delays in the permitting process that apply not only to tree removals but other needs, simplifying the process to apply for existing hardship exemptions and eliminating the $1.500 appeal fee for residents.
“Weakening the Tree Ordinance at a time when Miami’s tree canopy averages just 17-18% citywide — far short of the 30% goal set in 2009 — is both irresponsible and contrary to the best interests of residents. Trees are essential for combating extreme heat, reducing flooding, improving air quality, and enhancing property values. The proposed changes prioritize developers at the expense of Miami’s long-term sustainability and livability for its residents.”
The residents feel that deferring the item over and over again is just a political tactic meant to wear the public out, in hopes that they stop resisting and showing up to the meetings.

“Enough is enough,” said Downtown Neighbors Association President James Torres. “Public records reveal that lobbyists and developers are leading the way in crafting this ordinance. The endless deferrals are not about improving the proposal—they’re about wearing down residents who are fighting to protect Miami’s tree canopy.”
Read related: Judge dismisses amended corruption complaint against Miami’s ADLP
If there is a deferral, they request a six-month deferral to study the inefficiencies and challenges and create a working group of stakeholders to include the Miami Climate Resilience Committee  — which has recommended denial of the changes — and the Historic and Environmental Preservation Board as well as certified arborists, non-profits and county officials.
“We remind you that you were elected to represent the residents of the City of Miami. The overwhelming feedback from your constituents is clear: withdraw this agenda item and focus on strengthening, not weakening, protections for our vital tree canopy,” the letter ends. “Residents of Miami deserve to live in a city where tree-lined streets, shaded neighborhoods, and clean air are the standard, not a privilege reserved for a few. Strengthening the implementation of the existing Tree Ordinance, rather than dismantling it, is the path forward for a healthier, more resilient Miami.
“We hope you will act in the best interest of your constituents and the city we all call home.”
That’s a big ask.
The DNA will join other Miami residents who spoke at the sunshine meeting and representatives of environmental groups like the Sierra Club at City Hall Thursday morning for a press conference to challenge the changes in advance of the meeting.
The post Miami tree removal ordinance changes unnecessary and tainted by lobbyists appeared first on Political Cortadito.

Read Full Story